However, the Delhi High Court's single judge held that the avoidance application could not be pursued after the conclusion of the CIRP.Tata Steel is challenging the January 13 order where the Delhi High Court directed the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to proceed with the hearing of the avoidance application but said the amount recovered can be distributed amongst the secured creditors in accordance with law as determined by the NCLT.In this order, the judge ruled that any order related to avoidance transactions must be passed before the approval of the resolution plan.The Supreme Court heard the matter on Friday and the next hearing could be after 6-8 weeks, a lawyer said.The court observed that the investigation of such transactions is a lengthy process and it will be impossible to conclude these proceedings within the time frame laid down in the process.